Talk by Fabian Heck (Leipzig University) in the Syntax Colloquium

We are happy to announce a talk by Fabian Heck (Leipzig University) in the Syntax Colloquium. The talk will take place in person. Room IG 4.301 Date: January 16 Time: 4 pm – 6 pm ct Title: Empty expletives and the EPP Abstract: Since its introduction in Chomsky (1981), the EPP has remained a mistery. In particular, there is no consensus on what the EPP could derive from, or why it should exist (but cf. Haider 2010 for an interesting approach). Within the last 20 years, various proposals have been made that try to connect the EPP to some phonological property. In particular, there is a class of approaches claiming that the EPP requires that SpecT be filled by some *phonologically overt* category (e.g. Holmberg 2000, Bobaljik 2002, Landau 2007, Richards 2016, McFadden & Sundharesan 2018). Such a view appears to be incompatible with the very concept of an empty expletive. In my talk, I argue that there are reasons to assume that empty expletives exist. If...
Read More

Talk by Daniel Aremu (GU) in the Syntax Colloquium

We are happy to announce a talk by Daniel Aremu (GU) in the Syntax Colloquium. The talk will take place in person. Room IG 4.301 Date: January 09 Time: 4 pm – 6 pm ct Title: Association with Focus Sensitive Particle only in Kasem and Kusaal Abstract: The syntactic properties and distribution of Focus Sensitive Particles (FSPs) (alternative-sensitive particles, à la Hartmann & Zimmermann 2008) like only, also, even, too, almost, etc., have been a cross-linguistic conundrum for some decades. Although two approaches/analysis have been muted: adnominal analysis (the adjunction of the FSP to the focused DP) (Ross & Cooper 1979), and adverbial analysis (adjunction to the Extebded Verbal Projections (EVPs)) (Jackendoff 1972; Jacobs 1983; Büring & Hartmann 2001; Mursell 2020), the choice of analysis is not an easy one to make. In fact, languages which seems to show an adnominal positionon the surface, have been argued to involve an EVPs adjunction (eg. German, Büring& Hartmann 2001; Mursell 2020) (cf. König 1991). Even what seems to be a clear dichotomy in...
Read More

Vortrag von Stephan Busemann (Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz)

Wir freuen uns einen Vortrag von Stephan Busemann (Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz) anzukündigen. Titel: Warum Maschinelle Übersetzung das kann, was sie kann Zeit: 13. Dezember, 14-16 Raum: IG 4.301 (IG Farben Haus)   Alle sind herzlich eingeladen. Abstrakt: Maschinelle Übersetzung (MÜ) ist eine Abbildung von Texten einer natürlichen Sprache in eine andere natürliche Sprache durch Computer. Sie muss mit zahlreichen sprachlichen Phänomenen umgehen, z. B. Mehrdeutigkeiten, wie etwa Birne (frz. poire oder ampoule). Dabei hilft meist der Zusammenhang (Kontext), in dem die zu übersetzenden Wörter stehen. Wir betrachten, wie sich die Technologien zur MÜ im Kontext in den letzten 10 Jahren drastisch verändert haben, wie heutige auf maschinellem Lernen basierende MÜ funktioniert und welche gewaltigen Fortschritte MÜ in dieser Dekade gemacht hat. Um die Euphorie nicht überborden zu lassen, schauen wir auch darauf, was noch gar nicht gut geht und geben einen kleinen Ausblick, wohin die Reise geht.  ...
Read More

Talk by Anke Himmelreich (GU) in the Syntax Colloquium

We are happy to announce a talk by Anke Himmelreich (GU) in the Syntax Colloquium. The talk will take place in person. Room IG 4.301 Date: December 12 Time: 4 pm – 6 pm ct Title: Locality in focus marking Abstract: In this talk, I present an application of Graf's (2022) formalization of syntactic dependencies that suggests that (most) syntactic dependencies are based on adjacency, just like dependencies in phonology and morphology. Graf develops a tier-based strictly local  language (TSL) for these purposes. The talk will provide an  introduction into the complexity issue of language based on the Chomsky Hierarchy and then move on to explain Graf's TSL. Finally, the talk will apply the formalization to focus data from Likpakpaanl  trying to develop a diagnostic for the status of the focus particle. Concretely, I present an argument that the focus particle "le/la" in Likpakpaanl is a head....
Read More